Tuesday, April 11, 2006

 

My non-publications, post 2: Select Papers from my biblical studies graduate degree at Regent College

Some of the ealier papers require Mac Accordance fonts Yehudit and Helena; later papers require the standard SBL fonts SPTiberian and SPIonic.

A paper on the self-authentication of scripture vis-a-vis faith and autonomous human reasoning, using Locke and Calvin as case-studies,written for Paul Helm in Systematic Theology A. Mediocre. Click here.

A paper on I Pet 2:24-25,
written for Dr. Rikki Watts in Introduction to Exegesis. My first ever exegesis paper--very mediocre (but so-so for an intro-level class). Click here.

A paper on the use of Daniel 7 in Mk 14:62,
written for Dr. Rikki Watts in NT Seminar: the OT in the NT. My first real biblical theology paper--getting better. Click Here.

An analysis of the Source Critical method, written for Dr. Iaian Provan in Biblical Interpretation and Hermeneutics. Nailed. Click here.

A paper on Gen 15,
written for Dr. Iain Provan in Genesis. Clicke here.

A paper on christology in Ephesians,
written for Dr. G. D. Fee in Pauline Christology. Nailed. Click here.

A paper on the theme of Brother Versus Brother in Genesis,
written for Dr. Iain Provan in Genesis. Click here.

A poetic analysis of 2 Sam 11,
written for Dr. V. Philips Long in OT Seminar: Poetics of Biblical Narrative. My first poetic analysis--innovative not not perfectly communicated. Click here.

A paper on the narrative shaping of the Psalter, written for Dr. Iain Provan in Psalms. Click here.

A paper on biblical idolatry and image formation in Isa 6:9-10, written for Dr. Rikki Watts in Isaiah. Nailed. Click Here.

A paper on Isaiah and the film The Last of the Mohicans, written for Dr. Rikki Watts in Isaiah. Click Here.

A critique of Gregory of Nyssa's allegorical interpretation in his The Life of Moses, written for Dr. Bruce Hindmarsh in Introduction to Spiritual Theology. This one really burned me: The class was sub-par (great lecturing, though), and the pseudo-field is a made-up joke; yet the paper was graded as if it were for a 700-level class. I've graded 500- and 600-level coursework for 3 yrs. now, and this should have been an A paper at even a 600-level. Superiority of pre-critical exegesis my arse; leave it to spiritual historians to think they know how to do biblical studies. (Was all that too harsh?) Anyway, a required course I never wanted to take, and all I got was a blemish on my transcript for work that exceeded expectations. Nailed (I think). Click here.

A survey on the critical issues in the Didache, written for Dr. Don Lewis in Church History. Nailed. Click here.

Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?